Comparative Analysis of Cystolithalopexy and Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy in Senior Pediatric Population Aged 6 to 15 Years

Authors

  • Tariq Ahmad, Sher Wali Khan, Muhammad Tayyib, Mohammad Yasir Khalily

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20221611848

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To compare cystolithalopexy and percutaneous cystolithotripsy in children 6 to 15 years based on complications.

Methodology: The study includes 100 patients under the age of 6 to 15 years age, split into two groups called Group-A (45) and Group B. (55). Included were those patients with stones that were smaller than 20 mm in size (on average, 14 mm). Patients in Group-A received cystolithalopexy therapy utilizing a ureteroscope and a pneumatic lithoclast assisted by a Dormia basket. Patients in Group B received percutaneous cystolithotripsy therapy.

Results: The age range of the 100 male pediatric patients ranged from 6 to 15 years (mean age 8 years). The average length of stay in the hospital was 2.5 days for patients in Group A and 3 to 8 days for patients in Group B. Patients in Group-A exhibited higher rates of urinary tract infections (8%) and urethral injuries (22%), residual stones (1%), enlarged bladders (2.2%), urinary retention (4.4%), and fever (13.33%). While in Group B, 18% of the members experienced urinary tract infections, 5% wound infections, 4% hematuria, 7% bladder size enlargement, and 27% fever. In each Group, urine retention was 7%.

Conclusion: Pediatric male patients with vesicle calculus respond substantially better to cystolithalopexy because it requires less invasive surgery, leaves no scar, and has fewer complications.

Keywords: Bladder Calculus, Comparison, Cystolithalopexy, Ureteroscope, Pneumatic Lithoclast, Dormia basket, percutaneous cystolithotripsy.

Downloads

How to Cite

Tariq Ahmad, Sher Wali Khan, Muhammad Tayyib, Mohammad Yasir Khalily. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Cystolithalopexy and Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy in Senior Pediatric Population Aged 6 to 15 Years. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 16(11), 848. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20221611848