Comparison of the Outcomes Between Coronary No-Reflow and Slow-Flow Phenomenon in Non-Stemi Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221651407Keywords:
Coronary no-reflow Phenomenon, Slow-Flow Phenomenon, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Abstract
Background: Coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) and coronary no-reflow phenomenon (CNP) have the potential to raise the risk of severe cardiovascular adverse events (MACE).
Objectives: This study's goal was to evaluate and contrast the clinical outcomes after a year for CNP and CSFP patients who received PCI for a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
Methods: In this research, 95 patients had NSTEMI and had PCI within 24 hours after symptoms started. An angiographic characteristic of the infarct-related artery's TIMI flow was used to divide patients into two groups: the CSP group (n=85) and the CNP group (n=10). Patients were tracked for a full year. To be statistically significant, the p-value needed to be <0.05.
Results: There were 95 patients with NSTEMI included in this research (66 males; mean age: 62.71±13.70). CNP was seen in 10.5% (n = 10) and CSFP in 89.4% (n = 85) of NSTEMI patients, respectively. we provide the results of our demographic analysis.
Conclusion: When comparing CNP and CSFP patients with NSTEMI, the clinical results and risk of stroke are worse for CNP individuals.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.